A- A A+

Have you used related party loans in your super?

23 October 2014  |  Super

RelatedTwo areas of legal clarity are of great concern for DIY super investors.  One is the lending of funds on favourable terms to make investments in direct property or shares. The other is the rules for allowing excessive after-tax (non-concessional) contributions to super to be refunded rather than penalised by having the top personal tax rate (47 per cent) plus the Medicare levy imposed on the excessive amount.

The ultimate situation is not yet clear. But the AFR has an interview with superannuation tax adviser Daniel Butler of DBA Lawyers. He thinks the changes to the law could be 'quite dramatic'. He believes the ATO may forbid funds borrowing from related parties:

 

"This is a distinct possibility, says Butler, and would be better than the government scrapping DIY fund borrowing, a suggestion made by the financial system inquiry (also known as the Murray review).

DIY funds borrowing from related parties has been a controversial issue since the ATO approved a loan arrangement in a private binding ruling application that allowed a DIY fund to borrow from a related party and pay no interest on the loan. It later rejected at least a dozen other applications for related party loans with very low or nil interest rates and other favourable terms.

“The quickest way the government could clean up any controversial limited recourse borrow issues is to prohibit any related party loans,” Butler says. This would introduce a no-argument solution where funds wishing to borrow to invest would simply have to deal with a bank. It would also ensure every transaction is at arm’s length because that’s how banks do business.

With this as a possibility, Butler says any fund wishing to organise a related party loan should act sooner rather than later because if there is a dramatic change then the only arrangements that will be allowed are loans already organised, on terms that are currently acceptable.

A non-controversial related party loan has generally been regarded as acceptable so long as the loan terms are organised on an arm’s length basis, meaning they are very similar to terms between a fund and a commercial lender. This would suggest a loan with a similar interest rate, security requirements and amount lent (the loan to valuation ratio) to a commercial lender. Among the controversial terms in overly generous friendly party loans have been loans for 100 per cent of the property value, very flexible repayment terms as well as concessional interest charges.

Butler cautions that if super loan arrangements with related parties are restricted, DIY funds that have organised such loans on more favourable terms should expect the ATO to go back and start examining funds that have completed related party limited recourse loans.

If funds see any problems, they should amend arrangements before the taxman visits."

 

 

 

It is a salutary warning.

 

 

 

 



Similar articles from Super

More tap their super to pay down housing debt

 | 10/27/2014

HelpMore are using their super to pay down housing debt. But measures to make it easier would be a very bad idea because it would make the local capital markets even more concentrated.


Good preparation beats trying to pick markets

 | 10/9/2014

George LucasB2B financial services entrepreneur George Lucas says non-professional investors do not understand that the business of investing is not about picking where markets are going. It is about preparing well with a properly diversified strategy. And understanding that very few people in the Australian market make the important decisions.


The super fee rort

 | 9/14/2014

RortBecause super fund managers get paid a percentage rather than a flat fee, their income is soaring to extraordinary levels.


SMSFs have their own governance problems

 | 9/8/2014

GovernanceThe governance issues at retail and industry funds are signficant and are being widely debated. But DIY funds have their own, often unrecognised, governance issues.


Delay in super levy unwelcome politics

 | 9/3/2014

unwelcomeThe decision to delay the rise in the superannuation levy, in return for removing the mining tax, is an unwelcome intrusion of short term politics into long term national saving, many argue.


 

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.