A- A A+

How to avoid gambling

David James |  10 May 2015  |  Portfolio

CasinoMany think that investment is a bit like gambling. The language indicates this: words like "bets" and "punts" are often used. But think this through. Everyone knows that trying to beat the “house” does not usually work. So why take this approach?


The much better method is to become the "house" by not moving in and out of the market. Often, the best bet is not to make a bet at all. Especially when it is reasonable to assume that nobody can really predict where the markets are going.

It is clear that creating a diversified share portfolio and holding on to it for a long time is a pretty decent strategy. This is the opposite of gambling. It is in effect, saying, “I don’t want to play this game of poker, I will just sit here and take the ups and downs.”

Many investors who see the markets as a casino say: “I will just leave my money in cash because I don’t trust financial institutions. I don’t trust corporations. I don’t trust corporate governance.”

It is not a good solution for the individual. To give an idea of the consequences, if you invested in the S&P 500 index on January 1, 1970 then by December 31, 2009, just a year after one of the worst financial crises in history, it would have been worth $43,119. If you had invested in one month US Treasury bills over the same period, the $1,000 would only be worth $10,176.

And we all know what staying in cash now means in the Australian market, where the cash rate is at an historical low of 2%.

In other words, seeing investment as a matter of luck penalises both pessimists and optimists. The optimist goes in and out of the market, generally ending up with a much poorer return than the market average. The pessimist stays out of the market, thinking it is just for gamblers, instead choosing the no risk alternative of fixed interest. This may be low risk, but it also ensures a low return. In Australia currently, interest rates on government bonds are below inflation, so investors are going backwards.

The sound conclusion is in between: assuming that the market has its ups and downs, but that investing is not a matter of luck in picking those fluctuations. Instead, it is best to avoid making bets and just stick to a consistent strategy. That way you won’t be able to “beat the house” but you will be able to be the house.

 




Similar articles from Portfolio

When is a retiree rich?

 | 5/27/2015

RichA million dollars may sound like a lot of money. But when you look at the income you get, especially in an environment of low interest rates, it is not.


Layer upon layer upon layer ...

David James | 3/16/2015

LayerThe push to get better returns from "smart beta" is creating a proliferation of computer driven trading strategies. It is a kind of robot-driven bubble.


Are investors their own worst enemy?

David James | 3/15/2015

Worst EnemyThe problem with human psychology is that it can get in the way of rational decision making. It is something to remember for those who have a DIY super fund.


SMSFs look abroad

 | 2/22/2015

Going global Analysis by the SMSFA suggests that as the global economy recovers, trustees are looking overseas.


The risks of 'cheap' shares

 | 12/4/2014

Danger"Buy on weakness" is a common stock broker recommendation. But are there dangers in purchasing shares when they have fallen? Some research suggests so.


 

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.