A- A A+

Is the bank play in trouble?

04 May 2015  |  Investing

BankWestpac came in with a poor profit result on Monday and announced a dividend of 92 cents rather than the 93 cents the market expected.It is still a strong yield, but is it a sign of future earnings weakness in the banks? Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley certainly think so. They have both downgraded the bank and caste doubt on the future profitability of the sector.

The AFR is reporting that Credit Suisse has maintained its underperform rating, and is beginning to suspect that the entire banking sector may be re-rated:


"Goldman Sachs downgraded Westpac from buy to neutral and Morgan Stanley from equal-weight to underweight on the back of Monday's result in which Westpac announced a cash profit of $3.78 billion in the six months to March 31. 

The result was $100 million below analysts' expectations and flat compared to a year ago. The bank also disappointed investors by lifting its dividend by less than expected - a 93 cent fully franked dividend rather than 94 cents.  

Westpac and the other major banks faced a number of profitability headwinds, said Goldman Sachs. A number of these were related to the mooted tightening of bank lending by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

In particular, a move to higher mortgage risk weights and higher capital requirements would impact on the sector. 


"We expect APRA to increase mortgage risk weights for the major banks to 25 per cent post the Financial System Inquiry," said Goldman Sachs. By contrast, Westpac's current mortgage risk weight was just 16 per cent.

In summary Westpac faced a 2.5 per cent return on equity headwind, said Goldman Sachs. The firm reduced their 12-month target for the stock to $37.47 from $38.34."Morgan Stanley's 12-month price target for Westpac has been lowered from $33 to $30.70. The broker is saying that the growing pessimism about the housing market is eating into profitability:

"We forecast...a lift in the average mortgage risk weightings to 26 per cent," said Morgan Stanley. 

"However, we see the risk of even more onerous requirements for investment property loans, which account for over 46 per cent of Westpac's Australian mortgage book."


Westpac's result was "ringing the bell for the sector", which it descibes as "expensive". The big question facing investors is will the banks in future be as good an investment as they have been in the past. Given the narrowness focus of most SMSF's equity exposure -- there has been a heavy bias towards large cap stocks that pay high ranked dividends -- it is an important question.



Source articles

Similar articles from Investing

Rising rates a seminal point

 | 5/26/2015

pointThere are indications that the US Federal Reserve will soon start to raise interest rates. It is a sign that the unique investment conditions caused by the GFC are starting to alter.

More questions over the bank sector

 | 5/25/2015

BanksectorBanks have been the safe haven for SMSF investors. But they now dominate the ASX. Is it time to take a close look?

Problems with the yield play?

 | 5/24/2015

yieldBuying Australian shares for their dividend yield has been a sound strategy for DIY super funds. But with earnings coming under pressure there may be some difficulties looming on the horizon.

A good benchmark

 | 5/20/2015

BenchmarkWhat should super investors regard as a good yardstick for their investment returns over time? There are some indicators.

The dangers of the search for yield

 | 5/11/2015


A comment about SMSF investing into shopping centres implies the potential dangers of going for yield in tough investment times.



Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »



The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.