A- A A+

More questions over the bank sector

25 May 2015  |  Investing

BanksectorHigh dividend paying bank stocks have been a rock for DIY super investors, providing strong income and franking credits. In a global investment environment struggling with low interest rates it has been a highly successful option. But markets constantly change, and what has worked in the past may not always work.

The AFR has a story today on Lazard fund, suggesting that the banks are heavily overweight, at 42% of the index, which is much higher than other booms in recent history:


"Osborn's lesson as a fund manager with almost 30 years experience is from recent history. The faith of investors in the banking sector is the most recent and extreme instance of exuberance in Australia's stock market. This has seen its concentrated stock market index, and the passive investors that track it, load up at the top.

"Around the world, the biggest company in the S&P500 is only 2 or 3 per cent of the index. There's a lot of depth so it's a good measure of performance," he says.  

"But in Australia, there have been three times in the last 10 to 15 years where we think the index has been wrong and as an investor you don't want to be there".  

"The first was when the TMT or technology, media and teclos made up 37 percent of the ASX 200 in March 2000. At the time News Corp alone accounted for 20 pert cent of the stock market index while pie in the sky stocks such as Davnet and E-Corp captured the imagination of get-rich-quick investors.  


"The problem with the TMT bubble is there were little to no earnings. So when it came down it came down very badly for some".

In 2008 it was the once in a generation mining boom that led materials to account for almost 39 per cent of the index. TMT had declined to less than 10 per cent.

"This was the opposite [of the TMT bubble] – there was a lot of money. Companies were earning well in excess of what they should have earned and it was real money – so people were prepared to pay up."

Now we're in the most extreme manifestation. As at March, banks accounted for almost 42 per cent of that index while materials and energy has fallen back to account for 16 per cent.

With the banks making up such a large portion of the index, Osborn is warning that buying the index isn't the safe bet that it appears.  

"Like the other times, you need to be a bit smarter and be different from the index because we believe that the index is the risky bit," he says.

Osborn's view is that the banks are excessively valued, and his partner Dr Hofflin is presenting to current and future investors in the fund, questioning whether the extraordinary growth in credit that has fuelled the bank's profit growth is unsustainable."


The banks certainly have strong earnings. But they are also a property play -- because much of their business is mortgage lending -- and few would argue that the residential property market is not overheated. It all looks horribly concentrated, meaning that the risks are high. Diversification is the best option.



Source articles

Similar articles from Investing

Rising rates a seminal point

 | 5/26/2015

pointThere are indications that the US Federal Reserve will soon start to raise interest rates. It is a sign that the unique investment conditions caused by the GFC are starting to alter.

Problems with the yield play?

 | 5/24/2015

yieldBuying Australian shares for their dividend yield has been a sound strategy for DIY super funds. But with earnings coming under pressure there may be some difficulties looming on the horizon.

A good benchmark

 | 5/20/2015

BenchmarkWhat should super investors regard as a good yardstick for their investment returns over time? There are some indicators.

The dangers of the search for yield

 | 5/11/2015


A comment about SMSF investing into shopping centres implies the potential dangers of going for yield in tough investment times.

Is the bank play in trouble?

 | 5/4/2015

BankMost super investors who look at the stock market have invested heavily in Australian banks. The tax advantaged dividends have made it a good investment for a long time. But is the party partially over?



Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »



The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.