A- A A+

Mr Henry does something curious

David James |  19 March 2015  |  Investing

yield
The former head of the Treasury Ken Henry, has questioned the chase for yield by investors, which includes many SMSF investors. It is an interesting argument. He starts by making a case that Australia's mining boom was a one off thing:

 

"There really are no historical precedents," he says. "In 1951 the terms of trade increased by about 50 per cent. That's an enormous increase. People of my generation were taught that 1951 was an aberration – we should never expect to see anything like it.

"But between late 2003 and 2011, the terms of trade actually doubled – an increase of 100 per cent," he says. As commodity prices have fallen, the terms of trade has subsided, but Henry says the cycle hasn't run its course yet.

The collapse in commodity prices, which has led to a remarkable slide in the share prices of our biggest miners, combined with record low interest rates around the world, have contributed to the most overcrowded trade there is – the rush to yield."

 

This is a curious argument. Mining stocks typically don't offer much yield because they don't pay out much of their profits as dividends. It is stocks like the banks and Telstra that provide the yield plays. Henry may be right about some dangerous signals in the Australian economy and therefore the Australian stock market:

 

"Many people will remember how the tech boom unfolded," he says. "The several years preceding the GFC were also characterised by relatively low inflation and high global saving. And that period ended badly too.

"A question investor analysts should be pondering is whether, with low inflation and high household saving likely to be with us for quite a while, expectations of long-term yield might need to be revised down."

 

But surely this applies to capital gains, not yield? That was what the tech boom was about, and it is what mining investment offers. After all, in terms of capital gains, the All Ordinaries is yet to get back to its pre-GFC high. But investors have made a lot of money out of dividend yields.

Perhaps Mr Henry is more suited to macro-economics than investment. He may be right that the concentration on high yield stocks has been overdone; any long term market trend is often over done. He is also mounting a case that the Australian economy is entering some rough waters. But from an investment perspective it seems he is talking more about capital gains stocks, not yield stocks.

 

 

 




Similar articles from Investing

BHP and its dividends

Staff writer | 3/30/2015

BHPBHP Billiton is one of the world's resources giants and is a behemoth of the local bourse. Analysts believe it is fully priced, but it may also be attractive for its dividend, which is unusual for a mining company.


The flat lining Australian stock market

David James | 3/22/2015

FlatWhy is the Australian stock market going nowhere when world stock markets are rising? The answer is probably the concentration on dividend yield in the domestic market.


Property trusts strong

Staff writer | 3/17/2015

StrongProperty trusts are doing well, although there are some concerns in the office market. They may offer diversification options.


Debt and housing crises

 | 12/17/2014

HousingAustralia has had a debt fuelled explosion in housing prices, which has created a generational divide and made the Australian economy, and banks, dependent on the housing market. The lesson of crises, meanwhile, is that they are usually caused by excessive debt.


The timing myth

David James | 12/16/2014

MythMany think that investment is all about doing things at the right time. The long term evidence says otherwise.


 

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.