A- A A+

The politics of super emerges for the first time

David James |  19 May 2015  |  Super

DrawThe politics of superannuation have been largely hidden because of bi-partisan support for leaving it alone. Superannuation was a Labor initiative that quickly became appealing to the finance sector, which traditionally supports the Coalition. And as the pool of super funds burgeoned -- it is approaching $2 trillion -- it became a quiet leaviathin underpinning a great deal of what goes on in our capital markets and business.

 
"Labor has accepted the government's challenge to fight the next election over retirement incomes, with the declaration "bring it on".

In his formal response to last week's federal budget, shadow treasurer Chris Bowen will declare the government's new strategy of ruling out super tax changes beyond the next election is neither sustainable nor believable.

"The taxation concession on superannuation earnings in retirement is unsustainable. We can't afford it as a nation," he will tell the National Press Club on Wednesday.

"Someone has to show the courage to say it and to deal with it, and Labor has decided not only to do that but to do it before an election and seek a mandate to deal with it.

"Tony Abbott wants to make superannuation an election issue. Bring it on."

After Mr Bowen announced in April that Labor would make two tax changes to superannuation if elected, the government decided to make it a key election issue.

It dumped plans for an inquiry into retirement incomes and toughened its policy of making no adverse changes to super this term to one of making no changes beyond the next election either, thus rendering industry submissions to the tax white paper irrelevant.

Mr Abbott and his senior ministers have subsequently accused Labor of planning to plunder people's retirement savings to balance the budget."

 

The issue with ageing, however, is that most retirees will not get much benefit from their super because they do not have enough. And if the Coalition does not target super, then it will be tempted to look at pensions. So we will have a battle of the lobby groups:

 

"The shift has angered much of the industry and seniors groups have withdrawn their in-principle support for changes to the part pension negotiated by Social Services Minister Scott Morrison. These changes were an alternative to reducing the indexation rate of all age pensions.

Seniors groups only supported the changes so long as super was looked at as well.

"We are very, very disappointed that the government would pick the low-hanging fruit of pensions and ignore super completely,"  Michael O'Neill, the chief executive of National Seniors Australia, told The Australian Financial Review.

"You can't effectively disconnect the two of them. They are inextricably linked."

Labor has promised to introduce a concessional tax rate of 15 per cent tax on all income derived by from super of over $75,000 a year, which would affect people with about $1.5 million in their accounts. It will also drop from $300,000 to $250,000 the income threshold at which the 30 per cent concessional rate applies to contributions.

Mr Bowen will point out that last week's budget noted that tax foregone on super would reach $50.6 billion a year by 2018, overtaking the estimated $50.4 billion annual cost of the age pension."

 

There is a case for looking at super, but that does not mean it is politically smart to do so. There is an even better case to look at negative gearing, and neither side is showing much appetite for that because of the political fall out. It will make for a fascinating series of political manouevres.

 

 

 



Similar articles from Super

SMSFs and business ownership

 | 5/27/2015

BusinessPutting a commercial business into super is possible, but requires care.


Is there growing SMSF disillusionment?

 | 4/23/2015

quitThere may be some signs of a growing number of people closing down their SMSFs. But if so, it is only a recent trend.


America having its own debate about financial advice

Staff reporter | 3/25/2015

debateIt is not just Australia that is looking very closely at the financial advice industry and its effect on retirement funds. The United States is also examining the issue closely as well.


Churn in the financial advice industry

Staff reporter | 3/23/2015

exitThe financial advice sector is making a come back, but there is a high level of dissatisfaction amongst some clients. Many also consider full service too costly.


Combining the housing and super juggernauts

David James | 3/11/2015

Joe HockeyPutting together super and housing would distort the Australian economy even more. Treasurer Joe Hockey's flagging of the idea seems ill advised.


 

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.