A- A A+

The super fee rort

14 September 2014  |  Super

RortPerhaps the best business to be in today is the super fund business. Not only are you gauranteed an inflow of 9% more funds each year, you can charge a per centage as your fee, not a flat amount. That means that your income keeps soaring no matter what you do.

What a business! Income is not tied to performance, and it keeps rising. That is why the Treasury estimates that the $21 billion going on super fees is about three times what it should be. It is also why the number of SMSFs has burgeoned, as people have realised that, as long as they have sufficiently large super, it is better to pay the fees to yourself.

The AFR points out that the Murray inquiry into the financial sector is really heating up in this area:


"The latest fee survey to come across this reporter’s desk, from research house Rainmaker, suggests that the introduction of no-frills MySuper products in January this year is having the desired effect. Total fees paid by members as a proportion of assets under management have fallen to an average of 1.12 per cent from 1.24 per cent in 2013 and 1.33 per cent in 2009, the year the former Labor government commissioned the Cooper Review into super. It is a significant fall, but thanks to asset-based fees and the enormous growth of the industry, the fee take has soared.

The Rainmaker findings suggest that the total fee take has risen nearly 60 per cent to $21.3 billion in since 2009. Little wonder that financial services accounts for more than 10 per cent of Australia’s gross domestic product.

Setting aside that not-so-small gripe, it appears that the fee gap between the for-profit and not-for-profit sectors has narrowed substantially, at least for employees of large-ish firms. This year members of master trusts are paying 0.12 percentage points more than members of not-for-profit funds, such as industry schemes. Five years ago they were paying 0.27 percentage points more. For anyone reading this column who is a personal member of a retail fund, they would be wise to re-think their arrangements. Without the benefit of discounts provided by large employers, they are paying an average fee of 1.59 per cent.

Admittedly the premium for being an individual member has fallen sharply over the past few years, but that is still a lot to be giving away to a fund provider for no extra services."


There is also the whole question of whether you pay your fund manager to be active or passive. In theory passive investment should be a lot cheaper, because nothing much is done. But equally active investment can be too expensive because it is very arguable that it actually works, and the transaction costs, because of the increased trading, are higher. The research indicates that it is diversification, rather than being active, that gives the bigger funds an advantage:


"Chant West, another research firm, has also waded into the fee debate, this time looking at the old nugget of passive and active management.

Passive management, which utilises computer programs to track underlying indices, is becoming increasing popular as super funds and private investors become more cost conscious and tire of paying hefty fees to fund managers who take only small bets on shares. For individual investors, this approach makes sense, notes Warren Chant, a director of the firm. Individual investors are typically charged anywhere between 1.75 per cent and 2.25 per cent for the privilege of investing in an actively managed Australian shares vehicle, where professional investors try to outperform the underlying market. “Essentially, at the retail level, active managers’ higher fees cancel out any excess returns they generate,” Chant West argues.

But the same cannot be said for super funds, which, because of their size are able to put the squeeze on investment management fees to, say, between 0.3 per cent and 0.5 per cent for actively managed Australian equities.

The Chant West analysis shows that the 10 largest balanced super products, which oversee assets worth a combined $364 billion, gained 7.2 per cent annually over the past 15 years, against a 6.4 per cent annual gain by a “passive benchmark”.

That is a significant difference. But it is not all about performance.

The research house calculates that about one third of the uplift is due to the ability of active fund managers to beat the relevant index. By far the bigger reason for the outperformance by the 10 big super funds is their ability to run a more diversified portfolio. Asset classes such as unlisted infrastructure, hedge funds and private equity, where there is no ability to invest passively, have performed well in recent years."


This is a salutary lesson for SMSF managers. Look for diversification.


Similar articles from Super

SMSFs have their own governance problems

 | 9/8/2014

GovernanceThe governance issues at retail and industry funds are signficant and are being widely debated. But DIY funds have their own, often unrecognised, governance issues.

Delay in super levy unwelcome politics

 | 9/3/2014

unwelcomeThe decision to delay the rise in the superannuation levy, in return for removing the mining tax, is an unwelcome intrusion of short term politics into long term national saving, many argue.

The in-house assets trap

 | 8/27/2014

jailTrustees of SMSFs need to be careful of the in house assets rules. Contraventions of these rules account for more than a quarter of all breaches.

Small super tax is big politics

 | 8/26/2014

taxThe tax breaks on super are becoming a major political issue. But the real winners are those in the financial services industry.

ATO reviews SMSF Tax concessions data

 | 8/25/2014

cheatMore than half of self managed super funds pay no tax, according to ATO data. In particular, dividend imputation gives them a tax holiday. The average fund now has $920K.



Subscribe to the Personal Super Investor weekly email to keep abreast of developments in SMSF law and investment markets. SMSF investors looking to improve investment returns from shares, property, cash or other specialised investments, will find the PSI weekly newsletter an invaluable resource.

Subscribe now »


The contents of this website are of a general nature only and have not been prepared to take into account any particular investor's objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Our content is not intended to be advice and must not be relied upon as such. You should seek independent advice tailored to your specific circumstances prior to making any decisions. Personal Super Investor does not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products: Where this website or it derived newsletter/electronic publication refers to a particular financial product, whether it be within our editorial or a 3rd party advertising, advertising promotion or advertorial, then you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. We also recommend that you should seek professional advice from a financial adviser before making any decision to purchase any financial product referred to on this website. We do not make any representation or warranty that any material on the Personal Super Investor website will be reliable, accurate or complete, nor do we accept any responsibility arising in any way from errors or omissions of our content or any content provided by any advertiser appearing the Personal Super Investor website. We will not be liable for loss resulting from any action or decision by you in reliance on the Material (whether editorial or advertising) on the Personal Super Investor website, nor any interruption, delay in operation or transmission, virus, communications failure, Internet access difficulties, or malfunction in your equipment or software. By using the site you acknowledge that we are not responsible for, and accept no liability in relation to any content contained on the site that you may use, including any other users’ use of the Personal Super Investor website in any circumstance. You use the Personal Super Investor website at your sole risk.